LOANFIGHT™Call 732.801.0376
FINANCING Start a DealProgramsCompare Loan Estimate TOOLS & EDUCATION CalculatorsCredit EducationMortgage InsightsReal-World ScenariosMortgage Q&A ABOUT LOANFIGHT Client ReviewsAbout LoanFightPartner With LoanFightContact Tell Us About Your Deal →
Fix & flip guide

ARV and Loan-to-Cost Explained: Fix and Flip Loan Math (2026)

Two numbers decide how much a flip lender will advance: what the project costs and what the finished property is worth. This guide shows how loan-to-cost and the ARV cap work together, with worked examples you can check line by line.

Reviewed October 2026 · Educational investor guide · Leer en español

How do ARV and loan-to-cost work together?

Loan-to-cost (LTC) compares the loan with what the project costs; the ARV cap compares it with what the finished property should be worth. Flip lenders commonly advance up to about 85–90% of the purchase and 100% of the rehab, then cap the total loan near 70–75% of ARV. Whichever limit is lower sets your loan.

Max loan = lower of (purchase % × price + rehab % × budget) and (ARV % × ARV)

Some lenders add a third test, a cap on total loan-to-cost, and lend the smallest of the three. Ask every lender for each test in writing, because whichever binds sets your cash to close. The fix-and-flip program page covers the rest of the loan.

ARV, LTC and LTV in plain English

TermFormulaWhat it tells the lender
After-repair value (ARV)Appraised value “subject to” the planned workWhat the property should be worth when finished
Loan-to-cost (LTC)Total loan ÷ (purchase price + rehab budget)How much of the project the lender is paying for
Loan-to-ARV (LTARV)Total loan ÷ ARVThe lender’s cushion if it has to sell the finished house
As-is LTVInitial advance ÷ current (as-is) valueExposure on day one, before any work is done

Many lenders base the purchase advance on the lower of the contract price or the as-is appraised value. If you are buying below market, that helps; if the appraiser thinks you overpaid, the advance shrinks and your down payment rises.

How is ARV determined?

ARV is usually set by an appraisal or broker valuation that reviews your scope of work and comparable renovated sales nearby. The appraiser values the property “subject to” completion of the plan you submit, so a vague budget produces a cautious number. To support ARV:

  • Submit a line-item scope that matches the finish level of your comps.
  • Use closed sales of renovated homes, not list prices, in the same neighborhood and size range.
  • Do not count on improvements the market does not pay for, such as luxury finishes in an entry-level area.

ARV is an estimate, not a sale price. Lenders cap the loan well below it to absorb selling costs, overruns and market moves.

Example 1: the cost-based limit binds

Purchase $300,000, rehab $80,000, ARV $520,000. The lender offers 90% of purchase, 100% of rehab and a 70% ARV cap. Illustrative assumptions, not a quote.

Purchase advance: 90% × $300,000$270,000
Rehab holdback: 100% × $80,000$80,000
Cost-based limit$350,000
ARV limit: 70% × $520,000$364,000
Maximum loan (lower of the two)$350,000
Loan-to-cost: $350,000 ÷ $380,00092.1%
Loan-to-ARV: $350,000 ÷ $520,00067.3%
Down payment: $300,000 − $270,000$30,000

The ARV leaves $14,000 of room, so the cost-based percentages decide the loan. Your cash is the $30,000 down payment plus points, closing and carrying costs.

Example 2: the ARV cap binds

Same purchase and ARV, but the scope grows to a $120,000 rehab.

Purchase advance: 90% × $300,000$270,000
Rehab holdback: 100% × $120,000$120,000
Cost-based limit$390,000
ARV limit: 70% × $520,000$364,000
Maximum loan (lower of the two)$364,000
Shortfall you fund: $390,000 − $364,000$26,000
Your project equity: $30,000 + $26,000$56,000
Loan-to-cost: $364,000 ÷ $420,00086.7%

A bigger budget did not raise the loan, because the ARV cap stopped it. Lenders handle the $26,000 gap differently: many cut the purchase advance so you bring it at closing, while others reduce the rehab holdback so you pay for some work yourself. Ask which method applies, because it changes when the cash is due.

Example 3: a total loan-to-cost cap

Go back to Example 1, but the lender also caps the total loan at 85% of total cost.

Cost-based limit (90% purchase + 100% rehab)$350,000
ARV limit: 70% × $520,000$364,000
Total LTC cap: 85% × $380,000$323,000
Maximum loan (lowest of the three)$323,000
Extra cash versus Example 1: $350,000 − $323,000$27,000

“90% of purchase and 100% of rehab” sounds better than it is when a total-LTC cap sits behind it. Always ask for every sizing test.

Low-appraisal stress test: in Example 1, if the ARV comes in at $460,000 instead of $520,000, the ARV limit becomes 70% × $460,000 = $322,000. That is now lower than the $350,000 cost-based limit, so the loan falls by $28,000 and your equity rises from $30,000 to $58,000 before costs.

The “70% rule” is an investor rule of thumb, not a loan rule

Many flippers screen deals with the 70% rule: pay no more than 70% of ARV minus repairs. It is a quick filter for margin, not a lender requirement.

ARV × 70%: $520,000 × 70%$364,000
Less rehab budget−$80,000
Maximum offer under the 70% rule$284,000

In Example 1 the $300,000 price is above that screen, which is a signal to check the margin carefully, not a rule that the lender applies.

Deal margin check for Example 1

Lenders care about margin because it is their cushion too. Using 2 points on the $350,000 loan, $6,000 of other closing costs, illustrative selling costs of 8% and an illustrative $4,000 a month of carrying costs (interest, taxes, insurance, utilities) for six months:

Projected sale price (ARV)$520,000
Less selling costs: 8% × $520,000−$41,600
Less purchase price−$300,000
Less rehab−$80,000
Less points and closing: $7,000 + $6,000−$13,000
Less carrying costs: 6 × $4,000−$24,000
Projected profit before tax$61,400

Run the same check at a lower ARV and a longer hold. If the deal only works at the top of the comps and the shortest timeline, the draw schedule and any delay will squeeze it fast. First flip? See how leverage changes for first-timers.

Want each sizing test run on your deal?

Share the price, budget and ARV estimate. LoanFight reviews the scenario and connects you with a lending partner whose purchase, rehab and ARV limits fit the project.

Tell Us About Your Deal →

ARV and loan-to-cost: frequently asked questions

What is a good loan-to-cost for a fix and flip?

There is no single standard. Commonly, lenders fund up to about 85–90% of the purchase and up to 100% of the rehab, which can put total LTC near 90% on a cost-bound deal, but the ARV cap or a total-LTC cap often brings it lower. First-time flippers usually see less.

What is the difference between LTC and LTV on a flip loan?

LTC divides the loan by the project cost (purchase price plus rehab budget). LTV usually divides it by a value, either the current as-is value or the after-repair value. Flip lenders commonly use both and lend the lower result.

What ARV percentage do lenders lend?

The total loan is commonly capped around 70–75% of after-repair value. The cap leaves room for selling costs, overruns and market changes. It varies by lender, experience and market.

What happens if the ARV appraisal comes in low?

The ARV limit falls and, if it becomes the lower test, the loan shrinks. You either bring more cash, reduce the scope or renegotiate the price. In this guide’s stress test, a $60,000 lower ARV cut the loan by $28,000.

Is the 70% rule a lender requirement?

No. It is an investor rule of thumb for screening deals: pay no more than 70% of ARV minus repairs. Lenders apply their own purchase, rehab and ARV percentages instead.

Do lenders use the purchase price or the as-is value?

Many base the purchase advance on the lower of the contract price and the as-is appraised value. If the appraisal comes in under the price, your down payment rises.

Run your ARV and LTC numbers with a real program

Tell LoanFight the price, budget, ARV, experience and timeline. We review the scenario before connecting you with an appropriate lending partner.

Tell Us About Your Deal →

Sources and review notes

Business-purpose treatment of credit to buy or improve non-owner-occupied property: CFPB, Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.3(a) and its official interpretation. Percentages and fees in the examples are illustrative and describe commonly published private business-purpose lending terms as of October 2026, not one lender’s guidelines. All arithmetic was checked line by line.

Educational information only, not an offer, approval or financial, tax or legal advice. LoanFight is not a direct lender and does not set final loan terms. Equal Housing Opportunity.